![]() By the time you license them up and get them fully functional, you have spent quite a bit of money. This is not the firewall to choose if you are looking for the cheapest and fastest solution. However, I don't find a lot of companies taking advantage of it. DNS security is important, and I think that Palo Alto's capabilities are effective and strong there. There is a license for DNS Security, which I have never actually licensed, but it is a very powerful tool. Also, there are a few others, like SD-WAN and GlobalProtect, which is one that we have because we have users who use Macs, Linux Boxes, and Windows systems. I have heard there is an advanced URL protection going to be released soon. There are a lot of other subscriptions available, such as DNS Security and URL protection. Depending on what the function is, there are ways around it. So, you don't have to buy all the bells and whistles for every firewall. I might want the Applications and Threats subscription and not much else. However, on the server side, I might not need very much. On the user side, I might want everything. ![]() It makes sense to take a look at your add-on functionality, like the Applications and Threats subscription and URL protection subscription. It gives you a high availability pair, but the pricing is only a slight increase over a single system. There is an advantage to going with the high availability pair licensing model versus the standalone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |